Rail service connecting Detroit, Ann Arbor, Lansing, Grand Rapids, and Holland?Â Yes, please! With the amount of travel we do just between the Leagueâ€™s Ann Arbor and Lansing officesâ€”let alone across the stateâ€”itâ€™s easy to see the benefit of the â€œCoast-to-Coast Railâ€ service described in a new ridership and cost estimateÂ study.
The study is the product of nearly five years of work by the Michigan By Rail coalition, in partnership with MDOT and local transit agencies across the state. It dives deep into current travel patterns and the conditions of Michiganâ€™s existing rail network to evaluate the costs and benefits of several possible routings across the state.Â Their conclusion: that new train service running 4 to 8 daily round-trips at maximum speeds of 79-110 miles per hour between our stateâ€™s major cities is possible, and would be popular.
This service could give me back 2 hours of productive time every time I need to go to Lansing for a meeting, rather than spending that time staring at the freeway in front of meâ€”Iâ€™m writing this blog post from the bus on my morning commute, after allâ€”and the ticket would certainly be cheaper than mileage + parking. Outside of work, when we take the kids to visit family in Grand Rapids, theyâ€™d certainly be happier riding the train than stuck in their carseats for two hours and change.
The study says I’m not alone–over a million people a year could be expected to use an 8-round-trip, 110mph rail option on any of the three routings examined. The preliminary financial analysis shows this ridership could actually let the service run a strong enough annual profit to cover Michigan’s capital costs of getting it up and running–not something that can be said of most road projects!
Of course, the real potential of this rail service relies on coordinating it with other pieces of the travel network to address the â€œlast mileâ€ question: how do I get from the train station to where Iâ€™m really going? Unless my destination is within half a mile of the station, Iâ€™ll need to pair the train service with something else: bikeshare or Uber or a seamless connection to local bus service, if Iâ€™m going a couple miles; something like ZipCar at the train station if Iâ€™m going a bit further.
What happens around the stations will also be important to making the service successful: people who live or work or go to school within that half-mile or so from a station are the most likely to use it regularly. Of course, the proposed service connects places that are already major activity centers, which contributes to the positive ridership forecast. Â But there are also plenty of surface parking lots, vacant industrial buildings, and similar potential near many of the suggested stations, providing good opportunities for upcycling to active uses.
Obviously, it will be a decade or more before the Coast-to-Coast service can be up and runningâ€”but spending that time to look at the land use and connecting transportation networks around the stations will be critical to cities and their residents getting the most of this opportunity.